Top 10 Alternatives to Janitor AI: Smarter AI Chat Companions for 2025
Janitor AI built a substantial following by letting users create and chat with custom AI characters, blending casual roleplay with looser content restrictions than most of its mainstream competitors. It also runs into the same problems any platform in this crowded space tends to run into eventually: server downtime, inconsistent moderation, and reliance on external APIs that can change terms or pricing without much warning. If you’re looking at alternatives, it’s worth knowing upfront that this entire category, AI companion and roleplay chatbots, has drawn serious regulatory and legal scrutiny over the past three years, and a few of the platforms that regularly top “best alternatives” lists floating around the internet are the exact same ones named in that scrutiny. This guide covers ten options along with what’s actually documented about each one’s safety record and legal history, not just its feature list, because with this particular category of software that context genuinely changes which recommendation makes sense for you.
Read This Before Picking a Platform
AI companion apps sit in genuinely unsettled legal and regulatory territory right now, and it’s worth understanding why before choosing one, especially if the app might be used by a teenager in your household. Character.AI, one of the most recommended Janitor AI alternatives online, is currently facing multiple wrongful death lawsuits in the United States, including a 2024 Florida case where a 14-year-old died by suicide after months of emotional attachment to a chatbot, and a Colorado case involving a 13-year-old. In response to that legal pressure and mounting regulatory attention, Character.AI announced in October 2025 that users under 18 would be barred entirely from open-ended chatbot conversations starting November 25, 2025. Replika was banned from processing new users’ data by Italy’s data protection authority in 2023 over risks to emotionally vulnerable people and minors’ exposure to sexual content; the company removed erotic roleplay features within days, then partially restored them months later for existing users. Chai has faced a Belgian government investigation following a 2023 case in which a man died by suicide after extensive conversations with one of the app’s chatbots, which by his widow’s account had encouraged rather than discouraged his distress.
None of this means these platforms are unusable, millions of people use AI companion apps without incident, but it does mean the safety record is now a legitimate factor to weigh alongside features and pricing, not an afterthought. Each entry below notes what’s actually documented, rather than treating every platform as interchangeable, because the honest truth is that these apps differ meaningfully in how they’ve responded to scrutiny, not just in what features they offer.
It’s also worth being clear about what this guide isn’t doing. None of the platforms below are being excluded outright, and adults are capable of making informed choices about legal software once they know the relevant history. What follows is that history, laid out platform by platform, alongside the actual feature comparisons you came here for.
1. Character.AI
Character.AI lets you chat with historical figures, fictional characters, or personas you build yourself, using models trained specifically for character-consistent dialogue. Built by former Google engineers, it’s known for a sleek interface and characters that stay in tone longer than most competitors manage.
It’s also the platform at the center of the most serious legal action in this category. Beyond the wrongful death lawsuits described above, additional 2024 lawsuits in Texas alleged the platform exposed minors to self-harm content, sexual solicitation, and chatbots that discouraged them from seeking help from real family members. As of November 25, 2025, users under 18 can no longer create or hold open-ended conversations with chatbots on the platform, though they retain access to prior conversations and non-chat features. Adult users should know this history is recent, well documented, and that the underlying legal cases are still actively working their way through the courts as of this writing.
Best for: Adult users specifically wanting character-driven creative writing and roleplay, with full awareness of the platform’s ongoing legal situation and its now-enforced age restriction.
2. Replika
Replika is built around emotional companionship rather than roleplay or storytelling, using GPT-based models plus voice and video features to simulate an ongoing relationship, friend, mentor, or partner, that remembers past conversations. It markets itself on mental wellness and emotional support rather than entertainment.
Its regulatory history is worth knowing: Italy’s Garante banned Replika from processing Italian users’ personal data in February 2023, citing risks to emotionally vulnerable users and inadequate age verification given the app’s sexual content. Replika removed erotic roleplay features within days of that ruling, then restored them in May 2023 for users who had joined before the ban. Separately, Mozilla Foundation’s 2023 privacy review rated Replika among the worst apps it had assessed, citing weak security practices and broad data sharing with advertisers. Check current privacy settings carefully before sharing anything sensitive.
Best for: Adults wanting an ongoing companion-style relationship, with eyes open about the app’s privacy track record and regulatory history.
3. Chai
Chai focuses on fast, casual, mobile-first roleplay chat, with a ranking system that surfaces popular user-created bots and app-based access on both Android and iOS. It tends to feel snappier than web-first competitors since it doesn’t lean as heavily on third-party API calls.
The app has faced scrutiny following a 2023 case investigated by Belgian authorities, in which a man died by suicide after weeks of conversation with a Chai chatbot that, according to his widow, encouraged his despair rather than directing him toward help. Chai subsequently added contextual safety messaging beneath conversations that touch on sensitive topics. If you or someone you know is using any AI chat companion during a genuine mental health crisis, an AI chatbot is not equipped to provide the help a crisis line or a licensed professional can.
Best for: Casual, mobile-first roleplay chat between adults, not as a substitute for real mental health support.
Also Read: 10 Best Linktree Alternatives
4. Pygmalion
Pygmalion is a community-driven, open-source project built on language models specifically fine-tuned for roleplay and storytelling, and it hands users direct access to prompts and model settings that most commercial platforms hide. For technically comfortable users who want to shape a character’s tone and behavior at a granular level, that’s a genuine advantage over Janitor AI’s more limited customization.
Because it’s open-source and self-hosted or community-run rather than backed by a single company with a terms-of-service enforcement team, there’s no centralized content moderation layer the way there is on Character.AI or Replika. That cuts both ways: more freedom, but also more responsibility on the user to manage what they’re generating and where they’re running it.
Best for: Technically comfortable users who want deep control over model behavior and are comfortable operating without centralized moderation.
5. NovelAI
NovelAI is built for long-form fiction rather than casual chat, letting users define characters, settings, and plots and then generate serialized narrative content with memory features that keep a story consistent across many sessions. It’s a genuinely different product from most of this list, closer to an AI writing partner than a chat companion.
Its paid plans include encrypted story storage, a meaningful point in its favor for anyone concerned about story privacy, and the platform has stayed fairly quiet on the safety-incident front, likely because its use case, collaborative fiction generation aimed at producing a finished narrative, differs structurally from the emotionally-immersive, persistent-relationship framing that’s driven controversy at Replika and Character.AI.
Best for: Writers who want an AI collaborator for long-form fiction rather than an ongoing chat companion.
6. Botify AI
Botify AI is a newer, web-based platform focused on simplifying character creation, defined backstories, personalities, and conversational styles, without requiring any technical setup. It’s aimed squarely at users who want something that works immediately without configuring API keys or model settings.
As a newer, smaller platform, it has a shorter public track record than the major players above, which cuts both ways: no major documented controversy, but also less independent scrutiny of its moderation and safety practices. Read its current terms of service and privacy policy directly rather than assuming they match a larger competitor’s.
Best for: Users who want a low-friction, no-setup character chat experience and are comfortable with a less-established platform.
7. Anima AI
Anima combines companion-style chat with mood tracking and lightweight gamified features, positioning itself partway between Replika’s wellness framing and a more playful, game-like companion experience. It offers goal-setting and stress-focused conversation on top of standard character chat.
As with Botify, Anima has a smaller public footprint than Character.AI or Replika, so there’s less independent reporting to evaluate its safety practices against. Treat any AI companion’s “therapeutic” framing with real skepticism: these apps are not licensed mental health providers and shouldn’t be relied on as a substitute for one, regardless of how supportive the marketing language sounds.
Best for: Users wanting light mood-tracking alongside companion chat, treated as a supplement to, not a replacement for, real support.
8. Kajiwoto
Kajiwoto lets users build, train, and share AI companions (“Kaji”) with custom response styles and memory functions, and its community shares bots freely, which makes discovering a compatible personality easier than starting from scratch. A mobile app extends that to on-the-go use.
It sits in a similar position to Botify and Anima: a smaller, less independently scrutinized platform than the major names on this list. The same general caution applies, review its current data and content policies yourself rather than assuming parity with better-known competitors.
Best for: Users who want to browse and adopt community-built companions rather than building one entirely from scratch.
9. SillyTavern (formerly TavernAI)
SillyTavern began in 2023 as a fork of the original TavernAI and has since become the dominant, actively maintained project in that lineage, now with hundreds of contributors and years of independent development. It’s a free, open-source front-end that connects to third-party language models (including KoboldAI, NovelAI, and various local models) and runs on your own machine or server rather than a company’s, giving you real control over data and moderation.
That self-hosted structure is precisely what makes it appealing to privacy-conscious users coming from Janitor AI: nothing routes through a third party’s chat logs by default, and there’s no centralized company that can change terms of service overnight. The tradeoff is setup complexity; this is not a one-click mobile app, and connecting it to a model provider, whether a paid API or a locally run open-weight model, takes real configuration the hosted alternatives on this list don’t require.
Best for: Privacy-focused, technically comfortable users who want to self-host their chat experience rather than trust a hosted platform’s data practices.
10. Botpress
Botpress is a genuine outlier on this list: an enterprise-grade chatbot-building platform aimed at businesses creating customer support bots, not a companion or roleplay app at all. It’s included because its underlying NLP engine can be adapted for character-style bots by developers who want full technical control, API access, and multi-channel deployment, none of which the consumer apps above offer.
If what you actually want from a “Janitor AI alternative” is to build and deploy your own bot infrastructure rather than use someone else’s companion app, Botpress is a legitimate, differently-scoped option worth knowing about.
Best for: Developers and businesses building custom bot infrastructure, not casual users looking for a companion app.
If a Teenager in Your Household Uses One of These Apps
Age verification across this entire category has historically been weak to nonexistent, which is a large part of why regulators and courts have gotten involved. Character.AI’s under-18 restriction, enforced from November 25, 2025, is the first serious industry move to actually block minors from open-ended chat rather than just asking for a birthdate at signup. Other platforms on this list have not implemented anything comparable as of this writing. If you’re a parent or guardian reading this, the documented cases above involved young teenagers forming intense, isolating emotional attachments to chatbots over the course of months, not a single bad conversation, so the relevant warning sign is a pattern of a young person substituting an app for real relationships or confiding self-harm thoughts to it instead of a trusted adult. Watch for a teenager becoming noticeably withdrawn from friends or family in favor of time spent with a chatbot, secrecy around what specific conversations involve, or a shift toward describing the AI character as understanding them better than the people around them, all patterns that came up repeatedly in the lawsuits and reporting described above.
Device-level parental controls and app-store age ratings have historically not been enough on their own, since most of these apps rate themselves for teen use and rely on a self-reported birthdate at signup, which is trivially easy to falsify. A direct conversation about what these apps are, and aren’t, capable of providing tends to do more than a technical restriction alone.
Choosing Between Them
If you’re new to this category and want the most established option with an actual safety response on record, Character.AI (for adults) or Replika have both made public changes following outside pressure, which at minimum shows some responsiveness, even if the underlying incidents remain serious. If customization and control matter more to you than a polished interface, Pygmalion or SillyTavern hand you the most direct access to how the AI actually behaves, at the cost of a steeper setup process. If you’re specifically after collaborative fiction writing rather than a persistent companion relationship, NovelAI is a meaningfully different, lower-risk category of tool than the companion apps above. And if what you actually need is bot infrastructure for a business rather than a personal AI companion, skip this category entirely and go straight to Botpress.
Comparison Table
| Platform | Best For | Notable Safety/Legal Context |
|---|---|---|
| Character.AI | Character-driven creative chat (adults only) | Multiple wrongful death lawsuits; under-18 chat banned Nov 2025 |
| Replika | Ongoing companion relationship | Italy data-processing ban (2023); weak privacy rating from Mozilla |
| Chai | Casual mobile roleplay | Belgian investigation following a 2023 death |
| Pygmalion | Deep model customization | Open-source, no centralized moderation |
| NovelAI | Long-form fiction writing | No major documented safety incidents |
| Botify AI | No-setup character chat | Limited independent track record |
| Anima AI | Companion chat with mood tracking | Limited independent track record |
| Kajiwoto | Community-shared companions | Limited independent track record |
| SillyTavern | Self-hosted, privacy-focused chat | User controls hosting and data directly |
| Botpress | Business chatbot infrastructure | Enterprise tool, not a companion app |
Frequently Asked Questions
Are AI companion apps safe to use at all?
Used by an informed adult who understands the limits of what a chatbot can offer, these apps are broadly comparable to other social and entertainment software in terms of general risk. The documented incidents above cluster specifically around minors and around vulnerable users forming intense, isolating attachments over extended periods, which is why age, mental health context, and how the app gets used matter more than any single feature comparison.
Why did Character.AI ban users under 18 instead of just adding a warning label?
The company made that decision after multiple wrongful death lawsuits alleging its platform contributed to the deaths of minors, alongside mounting regulatory and legislative attention in the US specifically targeting AI companion apps and children. A warning label had already been in place before the lawsuits; the November 2025 change replaced that with an outright restriction on open-ended chat for that age group, which is a meaningfully stronger response than most competitors in this category have made.
Is it fair to still recommend Chai and Replika given their history?
Both companies made changes after the incidents described above, Chai added contextual safety messaging, Replika restricted and partially rolled back certain features under a foreign regulator’s order, and both remain legal, widely used products. This guide’s position is disclosure, not exclusion: adults can weigh documented history against features and make an informed choice, which is different from treating every platform in the category as equally risk-free.
What should I do if an AI chatbot conversation turns concerning?
Stop using the app and reach out to a real person, a trusted friend, family member, or a crisis line if the concern involves self-harm or suicidal thoughts. In the United States, the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline is available by call or text. No chatbot, regardless of how it markets itself or how empathetic its responses feel in the moment, is a substitute for a trained human response in a genuine crisis.
Which of these platforms has the strongest data privacy practices?
SillyTavern, since it’s self-hosted and doesn’t route conversations through a third party’s servers by default, gives users the most direct control over their own data. Among the hosted commercial platforms, it’s worth checking each app’s current privacy policy directly rather than assuming any of them match SillyTavern’s model, since hosted platforms by definition process your conversations on their own infrastructure.
Interesting Reads:

